Mrs. Trump involved in contract dispute involving skin-care line

Just who had the authority to negotiate and finalize a contract is at the heart of a dispute against Donald Trump's wife, Melania, and a company called New Sunshine. Trump claims that she entered into a contract in fall 2012 with the business to distribute and market a skin-care line she developed with her own company called Melania Marks Skincare. The skin-care line was never distributed or marketed by New Sunshine and the person now in charge of the business claims that the contract is null and void.

At the time that Trump signed the contract she received $250,000. After that she says she did her part, making the rounds to media outlets and hosting social events to market the skin-care line. When she failed to receive any further compensation and it became clear that the line was not going anywhere, she sought damages of $50 million from an arbitrator.

In fact, the man Trump negotiated for over a year with, a manager of a private equity investment firm, is being sued by one of the individuals who invested in the firm, the head of a hardware chain. The hardware magnate claims the manager of the investment firm lost $500 million he invested. In an effort to recover the lost funds, the man sued the investment manager as well as some of his business partners. Trump is one of those business partners.

As a part of that lawsuit, the investor claims that the former head of New Sunshine was not authorized to make the deal he did with Trump. The alleged reason behind this is that the relationship the two shared was too close. Accordingly, the investor claims that the deal was too advantageous for Trump, who he alleges, was not in a position to market such a line.

Trump believes that she is a causality of the other disagreement and is owed the money promised in the contract.

As is the case in many contract disputes involving businesses, the circumstances surrounding the contract can be complicated. For this reason, businesses and individuals that face such claims usually find that it is best to work with a lawyer who handles such cases.

Source: USA Today, "Melania Trump maintains validity of disputed contract," Chris Sikich, Nov. 14, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Hear From Our Clients

Mr. Skolnik and Mr. Gaboury have represented me on multiple cases over the past two years. They are dependable, knowledgeable, and professional. They provided high quality legal guidance for my small business during a difficult time and brought me a peace of mind. I highly recommend Cox Padmore Skolnik & Shakarchy as your legal business representative. -Anonymous

Read More Reviews

Contact Us

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Tap To Request An Exploratory Consultation

New York Office
630 Third Avenue
23rd Floor
New York, NY 10017

Phone: 646-355-1648
New York Law Office Map

Great Neck Office
98 Cutter Mill Road
Suite 310N
Great Neck, NY 11021

Phone: 646-355-1648
Great Neck Law Office Map

Hackensack Office
27 Warren Street
Suite 304
Hackensack, NJ 07601

Phone: 646-355-1648
Hackensack Law Office Map

Denver Office
1060 Humboldt Street
Denver, CO 80218

Phone: 646-355-1648
Denver Law Office Map