Cox Padmore Skolnik & Shakarchy LLP remains ready to serve you during the COVID-19 pandemic. We are prepared to provide you with continuous legal service and uninterrupted communication. We are also monitoring the legal impact of COVID-19 and we are available to discuss any questions you may have regarding the CARES Act, insurance coverage issues, including business Interruption insurance, or other issues. Please see below for a list of our practice areas. You may contact us by the usual means of telephone and email, which is encouraged at this time. We will promptly respond. Video conferencing is also available. In all, our firm remains committed to assisting you throughout this evolving period of legal, business, and safety concerns.
Cox Padmore Skolnik & Shakarchy LLP remains ready to serve you during the COVID-19 pandemic. We are prepared to provide you with continuous legal service and uninterrupted communication. We are also monitoring the legal impact of COVID-19 and we are available to discuss any questions you may have regarding the CARES Act, insurance coverage issues, including business Interruption insurance, or other issues. Please see below for a list of our practice areas. You may contact us by the usual means of telephone and email, which is encouraged at this time. We will promptly respond. Video conferencing is also available. In all, our firm remains committed to assisting you throughout this evolving period of legal, business, and safety concerns.

CALL US TODAY: 646-355-1648

Innovative Solutions To Complex Legal Concerns
  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Mergers & Acquisitions
  4.  | Merger and acquisition process can be a complex game

Merger and acquisition process can be a complex game

| Oct 23, 2015 | Mergers & Acquisitions

Mergers and acquisitions occur for numerous reasons, but in most cases, the goal of a business merger is to benefit both companies involved. Even so, some companies in New York and elsewhere are less than enthusiastic about a merger or business acquisition, no matter how tempting the offer. There are many valid reasons for this – employees may resent new management or fear that the action will lead to layoffs or a change in the company climate. Executives in the boards of directors may find their positions terminated or reassigned. Company owners may also worry that the change will spook investors or deter customers.

A recent attempt to merge two health care companies may illustrate a common response by company executives. The outpatient management company AmSurg Corporation met with executives from TeamHealth Holdings, with the goal of expanding AmSurg’s physician-outsourcing services. Despite a $7.8 billion offer in stock and cash, TeamHealth’s president and chief executive rebutted that the offer was too low and the company was well able to continue its growth independently.

Previously, TeamHealth had acquired IPC Healthcare in a $1.6 billion deal, and the company’s current efforts are focused on integrating the short-term care provider. AmSurg’s chief executive posed its own recent integration with Sheridan Healthcare as an example as to why a merger with TeamHealth would be mutually beneficial. In fact, the executive strongly urged TeamHealth that delaying the merger could be detrimental to the smaller company. Nevertheless, TeamHealth’s stock rose by 19 percent after the letters were made public.

This example reveals the complex intricacies of corporate strategy. A business attorney may assist in advising companies of the best actions to take.

Source: The New York Times, “AmSurg Seeks Merger, but TeamHealth Demurs,” Oct. 20, 2015

Archives