There may be numerous vital factors to address when preparing to initiate operations on a new project. When it comes to the scope of a project, construction companies in New York may feel it vital to be as thorough as possible, but it might not always be easy to predict what the future may hold. While scope creep is an issue that remains common in this industry, it also remains a common source of construction disputes.
Reducing the risks of scope creep
Construction companies may find that knowing the possible causes of scope creep could be integral to taking steps to mitigate the risks thereof. One of the most common concerns may pertain to vague language in the project’s scope and being thorough with these terms could provide all parties involved with a clearer understanding of project goals and expectations. Experts also indicate that there may also be a greater risk of scope creep the longer a project remains underway and finding ways to reduce such risks in longer projects can be challenging yet imperative.
Issues with poor project management and lack of communication are also two common causes of scope creep in construction. When there are multiple parties operating on a project, the interactions of these parties could also affect project timelines and lead to an increased risk of scope creep. Similar issues may also arise when a client constantly requests changes to the scope of a project and if this party fails to understand the financial toll of scope creep, disputes may arise once payments come due.
Facing construction disputes
Regardless of how it happens, the presence of scope creep could take a toll on all parties involved in a construction project. Companies in New York that face construction disputes under similar scenarios and wish to seek insight in carefully evaluating their options could consider speaking with an attorney as soon as possible. An attorney can evaluate the situation a client is facing, provide insight on the best course of action to take and assist in preparing to navigate every step of the subsequent process.