Mergers are relatively common, if lengthy, business transactions. Successful companies combine their operations to share talent or intellectual property. They may create an entirely new brand, or the bigger company may absorb the smaller organization.
Mergers often require months of careful preparation and negotiations between the leaders of the organizations intending to combine their operations. There are issues ranging from redundant positions to challenges related to differing company cultures to address. Mergers are also subject to review from state and federal authorities. In some cases, proposed mergers may end up delayed or blocked permanently due to antitrust allegations.
When are business leaders at risk of regulatory authorities intervening in a proposed merger?
When the merger creates a monopoly
Regulatory authorities looking at a proposed merger have to consider the situation carefully. They need to consider how much influence each company currently has and how big of a market share the combined business entity might eventually establish.
In scenarios where it is likely for the resulting merged business to dominate the local economy or a specific niche, agencies may intervene in a proposed merger. Monopolies and the suppression of competition through company expansion may violate federal antitrust laws.
Certain industries, such as information technology and online retail, tend to have a few power players who have a significant impact on the industry and the economy. In such sectors, proposed mergers may face more scrutiny than they might in other, more diverse industries.
Looking at competitors, details of the merger and how combining companies can affect their market share can help business leaders determine whether a proposed merger may face significant scrutiny due to antitrust concerns. Leaders who perform their due diligence well in advance can limit the risk of a merger failing after months of significant investment.
